- Causes of Future Sea Level Rise
- Elevation Maps
- Will we really lose all that land?
- Sea Level Rise Planning Maps
3.4.2 Transferable Development Rights
To avoid or reduce the adverse economic impact on a landowner from sharply restricting development, some localities have adopted transferable development rights (TDR) policies.[312] In their simplest forms, these policies divide a jurisdiction into a sending area (where development is discouraged) and a receiving area (where development is encouraged).[313] The receiving area is zoned for relatively high-density development, while the sending area is zoned for agriculture and very low-density housing, e.g., 1 home per 10 acres. Under traditional zoning, landowners in the 10-acre zoning area have often complained that the zoning harmed them economically relative to owners in the high-density area,[314] and that the eventual 10-acre home lots did not preserve agricultural land as intended. Under a TDR policy, owners would be compensated for the downzoning, for example, with development rights to build 10 housing units in the receiving area (beyond what the zoning allows) for every 10 acres of land placed off-limits to development.[315] Provided that there is demand for additional units in the receiving area,[316] most owners would prefer to sell their development rights rather than build one home on 10 acres.
TDR policies can be used to decrease the hazards from sea level rise by designating a coastal retreat zone as the sending area:
- A locality may decide to concentrate coastal growth in a coastal protection zone while discouraging it in a coastal retreat zone.[317]In that case, the retreat zone would be a sending area and the protection zone would be the receiving area for transferable development rights. The greater density in the receiving area would also improve the economics of shore protection there.
- A locality may decide to discourage development in the coastal retreat zone but attempt to channel it inland rather than into a coastal protection zone.
In the 
ordinary TDR scheme, the land in the sending area where development is foregone 
remains undeveloped. In a coastal TDR scheme, however, the sending area may 
already have some development; and the policy could be designed to prevent 
additional investment that would make shore protection more likely. For example, 
a barrier island with moderate-density small cottages may be in the midst of a 
conversion to high-end housing. A TDR scheme could provide transferable 
development rights in return for placing the property under a rolling easement 
and avoiding any increases in the building footprint (or usable floor area). 
Another possibility is for owners to exchange rolling easements for a 
transferable development rights that will not take effect until their homes are 
lost to the rising sea. On a migrating barrier island, the receiving area could 
be the bay side of the island, so that the development right effectuates the 
relocation of oceanfront residents.
[312] Julian Conrad Juergensmeyer, James C. Nicholas, & Brian D. Leebrick, Transferable Development Rights and Alternatives after Suitum, 30 Urb. Law 441, 448–454 (1998).
[313] 
Id. at 
446–448.
[314] 
Id. at 
443–446.
[315] 
Id. at 
446–448.
[316] Some TDR 
schemes have failed because there was no demand for development in the receiving 
area. Id. at 
455.
[317] This appears 
to be the case for the Florida Keys. The growth management scheme for Monroe 
County Florida encourages growth to be transferred from Tier 1 keys to Tier 3 
keys (with Big Pine Key in the middle). See, e.g., Monroe County (Florida), A New Era in Growth 
Management: A Laymans Guide to Residential ROGO (Rate of Growth 
Ordinance) (2009). ROGO is more complicated than an ordinary TDR scheme because 
it reduces overall growth through a point system. Points are awarded for 
retiring lots in Tier 1, and it takes far fewer points to obtain a permit to 
develop in Tier 3. 
Id.
This page contains a section from: James G. Titus, Rolling Easements, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA‑430‑R‑11‑001 (2011). The report was originally published by EPA's Climate Ready Estuary Program in June 2011. The full report (PDF, 176 pp., 7 MB) is also available from the EPA web site.
For additional reports focused on the implications of rising sea level, go to Sea Level Rise Reports.

 3.4.1 Rolling Easements with Setbacks
 3.4.1 Rolling Easements with Setbacks